Cases 31 - 40 of 238
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill
as 2:2022cv04683
Petitioner:
Teral Sherman
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv04676
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Conover et al
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Jamie Conover, Guy Pagli, Jodi Wambler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Barillas v. Hill
as 5:2022cv02957
Petitioner:
Jose Humberto Barillas
Defendant:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacome v. Hill et al
as 3:2022cv00546
Petitioner:
Alexander Jacome
Respondent:
James S. Hill, Gavin Newsom and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tamara Hill v. Weston Solutions Inc, et al
as 22-1566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMARA E. HILL, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael S. Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTON SOLUTIONS INC, DL GEORGE AND SONS CONSTRUCTION CO, DL GEORGE AND SONS MANUFACTURING INC and others
Hill et al v. Philips RS North America LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Hill and Charles A. Hill
Defendant:
PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Raul v. CMC Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Defendant:
CMC Materials, Inc., William P. Noglows, David H. Li and others
Taylor v. CMC Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
CMC Materials, Inc., Richard S. Hill, Barbara A. Klein and others
Oday v. CMC Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Shalitha Oday
Defendant:
CMC Materials, Inc., William P. Noglows, David H. Li and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
