Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 111
SIMPSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2020cv00061
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff: KAREN SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04806
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: YOLANDA SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MUSELH v. SIMPSON et al
as 1:2019cv03570
Defendant: JEFF TINDALL, CHRIS SMITH, MIKE SIMPSON and others
Plaintiff: AKRAM ISMAIL MUSELH and AKRAM ISMAIL MUSLEH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2019cv02603
Defendant: SUSIE CORDI, JOSEPH SIMPSON, ZACH ADAMS and others
Plaintiff: BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv00214
Plaintiff: SHAWN B. SIMPSON
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01017
Defendant: BRIAN SIMPSON, STATE OF INDIANA, DIANNE (THELMA) SIMPSON and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00033
Defendant: Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Mercedes Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff: Robert Daniels and Kristine Simpson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
DAVIS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv00009
Defendant: JODEANNA RANEY, ROBINSON, RICHARD YARBER and others
Plaintiff: SAMUEL DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. KNIGHT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv04031
Respondent: WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner: EDWARD SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALVAREZ v. CITY OF MADISON et al
as 4:2018cv00219
Defendant: MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF MADISON, JONATHON SIMPSON and others
Plaintiff: JOHNNY ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?