Cases 31 - 40 of 367
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coil Processors, LLC v. Harvard Steel Sales, Ltd
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Coil Processors, LLC and Coil Processors, LLC doing business as Andes Coil Processors, a Delaware LLC
Defendant:
Harvard Steel Sales, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
STEELE v. SEVIER
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
HOWARD STEELE
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alli v. Leda et al
as 3:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Dartanin Alli and Dartanin Ali
Defendant:
Hanna Leda, H Leda, M Cavurro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHILLIPS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02268
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGLE, AKILAH LAMAR, MICHAEL A. GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chicago City of v. United States Steel Corporation
as 2:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
City of Chicago and Chicago City of
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MICKLES v. STEELE et al
as 2:2022cv00476
Defendant:
PATRICE POWELL, TAMONTE STEELE, LATOYA COPELAND and others
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fml Petition for Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
