Cases 31 - 40 of 85
SHORT v. HARTMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00741
Defendant:
Crystal Cook Meadows, John or Jane Does 1-5, Matthew Travis Boger and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Willis Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018hc02181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248
LIFEBRITE HOSPITAL GROUP OF STOKES, LLC v. AETNA HEALTH INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Plaintiff:
LIFEBRITE HOSPITAL GROUP OF STOKES, LLC
Defendant:
AETNA HEALTH INC. and AETNA HEALTH OF THE CAROLINAS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Banks v. Hooks
as 5:2018ct03076
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Kenneth E. Lassiter, Thomas E. Asbell, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIFEBRITE HOSPITAL GROUP OF STOKES, LLC v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2018cv00293
Plaintiff:
LIFEBRITE HOSPITAL GROUP OF STOKES, LLC
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STOKES COUNTY v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
STOKES COUNTY
Defendant:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
APPALACHIAN VOICES, ET AL. V. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
as 1:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
APPALACHIAN VOICES , NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and STOKES COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Stokes v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
George Victor Stokes
Defendant:
FNU Mitchell and Hubert Corpening
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Berryhill
as 7:2017cv00034
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Tasha Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Stokes v. Herring
as 3:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
George Victor Stokes
Defendant:
John A Herring
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
