Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Robertson, et al. v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv00874
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robertson , Larry Hankton , Sharvonne Johnson and others
Defendant:
Chevron USA Inc , BP Exploration & Oil Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Guillory
as 3:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Sammy Davis
Defendant:
Elbert Lee Guillory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Boggs et al
as 5:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Sammy Davis
Defendant:
Michael Boggs, Melanie Brogden, Michael D. Devane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MARK WAYNE CHESTANG, KENNY MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2013cv00846
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MARK WAYNE CHESTANG, KENNY MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mims v. USA
as 1:2012cv02977
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sammy Davis Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. Altria Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00329
Plaintiff:
Sammy Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Altria Group, Inc., Reynolds American, Inc., Republic Tobacco, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sammie King v. Mark Chestang, et al
as 12-10764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK CHESTANG, Officer and DENNIS C. SANDERS, District Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. Chestang et al
as 1:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sammie Davis King, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Chestang and Dennis Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
