Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHERWOOD v. BOWARS et al
as 2:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK A SHERWOOD, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARD BOWARS, LEANN DAVIS, SAMMIE DAVIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sammie King, Jr. v. Dooly SP Warden
as 23-12500
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DOOLY SP WARDEN
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
King v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Sammie Davis King, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Warren Co. Trial Court Hammond, District Attorney Dennis C. Sanders and others
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Protective Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv04292
Plaintiff:
Marlo Nelson
Defendant:
Protective Insurance Company, Big 8 Transportation, LLC and Sammy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
USA v. Sammy Dewitt Morgan
as 21-10114
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMMY DAVIS DEWITT MORGAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sammy Morgan v. Sacramento County Sheriff's De, et al
as 20-17180
Defendant / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SACRAMENTO MAIN JAIL, CROTEAU, Sergeant #143 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMMY DAVIS MORGAN
Morgan v. USA
as 2:2020cv01430
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sammy Davis Dewitt Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Sammy Dewitt Morgan
as 20-10150
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMMY DAVIS DEWITT MORGAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sammie King v. Mark Chestang, et al
as 20-11440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD HINSELY, WILLIAM DOUPE, DENNIS CARL SANDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
