Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Sevier et al
as 3:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Mark Sevier, Mrs Kallock, Dennis Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. SMILEY et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
LEVI EDWARDS, G. EWING, C. FUNK and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAKE v. SMILEY et al
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
JERRY DONALD SHAKE
Defendant:
DEE SMILEY and SUSAN STREETER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2016cv00354
Defendant:
LEVI EDWARDS and D. SMILEY
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP ANDREW EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GARRETT v. EWING
as 2:2016cv00331
Defendant:
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DAVIS, GREG EWING and others
Plaintiff:
DAEKWON TYREIM GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRAYLESS et al v. VIGO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 2:2016cv00281
Defendant:
GREG EWING, DEANDREA K. SMILEY, VIGO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. GRAYLESS and VIGO COUNTY JAIL INMATES IN "P-POD"
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAYLESS v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00276
Defendant:
P. DAVIS, EDDINGTON, GREGG EWING and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. GRAYLESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. SMILEY BODY SHOP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Defendant:
GREG CALLAHAN, JEFFREY SMILEY and SMILEY BODY SHOP, INC.
Plaintiff:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Shroyer v. Daniel et al
as 1:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Rocky Marciano Shroyer
Defendant:
C Daniel, C Dempsey, S Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
