Cases 31 - 40 of 91
RODRIGUEZ et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00200
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN, RAYMOND CASTRO, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
THOMPSON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01754
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAM THOMPSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., DIAMOND DRUGS, INC. and MEDICAL JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PATTERSON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
RICKY M. PATTERSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC , MARY COMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
THE VALSPAR CORPORATION et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
VALSPAR CORPORATION and VALSPAR SOURCING, INC.
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
SHELTON v. MERCHANT SOURCE INC. ("MSI") et al
as 2:2017cv02851
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT SHELTON
Defendant:
MERCHANT SOURCE INC. ("MSI"), GEORGE M. GRECO, JR. and DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. v. THE VALSPAR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00760
Plaintiff:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
THE VALSPAR CORPORATION and VALSPAR SOURCING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
