Cases 31 - 40 of 8,192
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alabama, State of et al v. Cardona et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Russell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Russell, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Tallapoosa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State of Alabama v. Berger
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Kenneth Douglas Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Norcold, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garrett v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Justin Garrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griggs v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Earl Griggs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
State Of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
