Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Hatten v. Taronis Technologies Inc et al
as 8:2019cv00876
Defendant:
Kevin Pollack, Ermanno P Santilli, William W Staunton and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hatten
Hatten v. Taronis Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00877
Defendant:
Kevin Pollack, Ermanno P Santilli, William W Staunton and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hatten
Johnson v. Staunton Public Defenders Office
as 7:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
Orlando Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Staunton Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Staunton City Police Department
as 7:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Staunton City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Orlando Maurice Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 3:2018cv03231
Defendant:
City of Staunton, Illinois, Mr. Robert D. Hearn, Casey's General Stores, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jason M Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 3:2018cv03227
Defendant:
City of Staunton, Illinois, Mr. Robert D. Hearn, Mr. Jeremy Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Jason M Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staunton v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04483
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. , Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Staunton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Polanco et al v. Ronka Restaurant LLC et al
as 1:2016cv04586
Defendant:
Paul Longo, Paul McDaid, Ronka Restaurant LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Morel Polanco and Ranulfo Rojas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JEROME v. DELAWARE COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2015cv05449
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EDDY JEROME
Respondent:
DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, MICHAEL DUGAN, CHRISTINA STAUNTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Staunton v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 15-2731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Jon Staunton
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Minnesota and Warden Michelle Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
