Cases 31 - 40 of 113
ABERNATHY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03188
Plaintiff:
Norman Franklin Goble Jr., Dell Webb, Vincent Beasley and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abernathy et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02167
Plaintiff:
Dell Webb, Vincent Beasley, Milton D. Buell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Stephen Mullican v. USA
as 19-5853
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN WAYNE MULLICAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richardson v. Reed et al
as 5:2019cv00668
Defendant:
L. Michael Colten, Susan D. Reed and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03581
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Madden
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Brookins v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01952
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Brookins
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
USA v. Stephen Collins
as 19-10546
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN WAYNE COLLINS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Whiting v. Michigan Department of Corr et al
as 3:2018cv11560
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Whiting
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and St. Louise Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiting v. Michigan Department of Corr et al
as 3:2018cv00339
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Whiting
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and St. Louise Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiting v. Boyd et al
as 3:2018cv00331
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wayne Whiting
Defendant:
John Boyd, Kribbs, Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
