Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Bell v. Ste. Genevieve County et al
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Bell
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve County, St. Francois County, Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Sygenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02274
Plaintiff:
Jeremy T. Graham
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Graham v. Sygenta Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jeremy T. Graham
Defendant:
Sygenta Corporation, Sygenta Crop Protection, LLC and Sygenta Seeds, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fitzpatrick et al v. American LaFrance, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Fitzpatrick, Robert T. Galloway, Patrick P. Galvin and others
Defendant:
American LaFrance, LLC, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp., Seagrave Fire Apparatus, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graham v. Warden of DeSoto C.I.
as 2:2014cv00264
Petitioner:
Equis T. Graham
Respondent:
Warden of DeSoto C.I. and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00406
Petitioner:
William T. Graham
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00297
Petitioner:
William T. Graham
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jerry Graham v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 13-17679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY T. GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HARRELL WATTS, CRAIG APKER and others
GRAHAM v. MARCELLINO et al
as 2:2013cv02785
Petitioner:
SHAROD T. GRAHAM
Respondent:
PETER F. MARCELLINO, GAIL FAIRMAN, MILTON BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
