Cases 31 - 40 of 11,761
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Graham v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04506
Plaintiff:
Tanika Graham
Defendant:
MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC and MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. SFM LLC
as 3:2024cv01334
Plaintiff:
Neelsun Graham
Defendant:
SFM LLC doing business as Sprouts Farmers Market
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
CARTHAN et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
BILLY CARTHAN, DAVIS DENTON, CLAY GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Graham et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 3:2024cv50204
Plaintiff:
Taffey Graham, Scott Graham, Chelsea McCracken and others
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William Graham v. United States
as 24-2131
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
United States of America
Bjorklund et al v. Ankeny Community School District et al
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jill Bjorklund, Mollie Jo Blahunka and Hurley Joseph Patrick, II
Defendant:
Ankeny Community School District and Jodie Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
