Cases 31 - 40 of 209,036
Hogberg et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Travis Hogberg and Audrey Rodriguez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Luning v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Michele A. Luning
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Medard, James v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21945
Plaintiff:
James Medard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Alsayedi et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Salah Mohamed Alsayedi and S & A 99 Cents Plus Corp.
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02336
Petitioner:
Stanley D. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02337
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williamson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Williamson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Broadnax v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marcus Derick Broadnax
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ortiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ismael Ortiz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reza v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
