Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Restricted Filer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Roberts, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Richards et al
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Charles A Benson
Defendant:
Karen E Richards, Adam Widener, Ted Linn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. WHEELER et al
as 3:2016cv00058
Defendant:
MATT BAI, LARRY BUSCHON, TOM CIBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BABY TREND, INC. v. PHIL AND TEDS MOST EXCELLENT BUGGY COMPANY LIMITED
as 1:2015cv01353
Plaintiff:
BABY TREND, INC.
Defendant:
PHIL AND TEDS MOST EXCELLENT BUGGY COMPANY LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Ladyman v. Meade et al
as 3:2014cv02038
Plaintiff:
Craig C. Ladyman
Defendant:
Nicholas Meade , Ted Bohner , Arthur Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feipel v. Gander Mountain Company
as 1:2014cv00304
Defendant:
Gander Mountain Company and Hunter's Manufacturing Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Ted Feipel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. BUCSHON et al
as 3:2014cv00130
Defendant:
REPRESENTATIVE LARRY BUCSHON, TOM CIBROWSKI, US SENATOR DAN COATS and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. TODD
as 4:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DALE JENKINS
Defendant:
TED R. TODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JENKINS v. TODD
as 4:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DALE JENKINS
Defendant:
TED R. TODD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON-TRATTNER v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2014cv01083
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART, ROBERT CAMPBELL, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER R. WILSON-TRATTNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
