Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05257
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ACF 2006 Corp v. Law Offices of Michael J. Libman APC et al
as 2:2019cv02920
Defendant:
Law Offices of Michael J. Libman APC, Michael Shabsis and Lisa Maki
Plaintiff:
ACF 2006 Corp
Counter Defendant:
Michael Swanson, Advocate Capital Inc, Daniel Taussig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wellgen Standard, LLC v. Maximum Legal Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01703
Defendant:
Maximum Legal (Florida), PLLC, Maximum Legal (Utah), LLC, Maximum Legal Staffing, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Christopher Tyler Webster, Gregory Allen Stuck, Jeffery Golden and others
Cross Claimant:
Philip Layfield
Plaintiff:
Wellgen Standard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Bergum v. Sacramento County DHHS et al
as 2:2019cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kristy Bergum
Defendant:
Sacramento County DHHS, Superior Court of The State of California and Parent Advocates of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates v. DeVos et al
as 3:2018cv06854
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Betsy DeVos and Elizabeth DeVos
Plaintiff:
Housing and Economic Rights Advocates
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ben Rothman v. Optima Advocates, Inc.
as 2:2018cv08341
Plaintiff:
Ben Rothman
Defendant:
Optima Advocates, Inc. and DOES 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Committee for a Better Arvin et al v. Andrew Wheeler et al
as 3:2018cv05700
Plaintiff:
Committee for a Better Shafter, National Parks Conservation Association, Committee for a Better Arvin and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler and Mike Stoker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
