Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Mark One Electric Co, Inc et al v. City of Kansas City, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv00790
Plaintiff:
Mark One Electric Co, Inc and SK Design Group Inc.
Defendant:
Phillip Yelder and City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moody et al v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2020cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sariah Moody, Grace Reading and Emily Cady
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nine Guys LLC v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
Nine Guys LLC
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colum v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2019cv00842
Defendant:
Joseph Piccinini, Unidentified Corrections Officer, MO Jackson County and others
Plaintiff:
Candy Colum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Popson v. City of Kansas City, Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Richard Smith, Kansas City, Missouri Police Department, City of Kansas City, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Tomas Caesar Popson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams et al v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
as 4:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joseph Knopp, Craig Adams and Joseph Knopp, III
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Myers v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2018cv00898
Defendant:
Robinson, Kansas City Missouri Police Department, City of Kansas City Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
