Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tyrone Davidson v. State of Michigan, et al
as 09-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE D. DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS and others
FITZGERALD v. PESSAR et al
as 2:2009cv00485
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FITZGERALD
Defendant:
SHLOMO SAM PESSAR, ELITE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, 561 SUMMIT REALTY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Afram v. Police Department of the City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv05136
Plaintiff:
James K. Afram
Defendant:
Police Department of the City of New York, Danielle Duignan, Catherine Gassick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cueto v. Thomas et al
as 3:2008cv00868
Plaintiff:
Amiel Cueto
Defendant:
Robert Thomas, Lloyd A Karmeier, Rita Garman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davidson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2008cv13761
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D Davidson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Supreme Court, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Masters Club LLC v. Town of East Hartford
as 3:2008cv01021
Plaintiff:
Masters Club LLC
Defendant:
Town of East Hartford, Melody A. Curry, Denise Horan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Masters Club LLC v. East Hartford et al
as 3:2007cv01503
Plaintiff:
Masters Club LLC
Defendant:
Town of East Hartford, Melody A. Curry, Denise Horan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
