Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Bryant, et al
as 10-40182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN BRYANT, JOE SMITH, TIMOTHY LESTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Adams v. Simmons et al
as 9:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Lonza J Adams, Jr
Defendant:
Timothy Simmons, Mark Duff, Mr. Mcworter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luther Cobb v. Timothy Simmons, et al
as 09-10737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUTHER WAYNE COBB, also known as Luther Wayne Ware
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY SIMMONS, Senior Warden, JOE NUNN, Senior Warden, MARYANN LAMB, Librarian II and others
Hughes v. Bryant et al
as 9:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Mark Hughes
Defendant:
Stephen Bryant, Joe Smith, Timothy Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Quarterman et al
as 9:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Marquez
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Timothy Simmons, Unidentified Woody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Davis et al
as 2:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Stevie Roberson
Defendant:
Yvonne Davis, NFN Daniels, Timothy Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marquez v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2009cv01018
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Timothy Simmons, Woody, D.D.S. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobb v. Simmons et al
as 2:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Luther Wayne Cobb
Defendant:
Timothy Simmons, Joe Nunn, Maryann Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simmons v. Pyburn et al
as 1:2008cv01312
Plaintiff:
Timothy Simmons and Timothy Simmons
Defendant:
Allen Pyburn, Randall Blankenship, James Hopewell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
