Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03302
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Parsons
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Shanticia Hawkins, C. Mutts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Ishee et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Petitioner:
Terrance Lamont James and Terrance Lamount James
Respondent:
Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper, Stephen Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hendrick v. Ishee
as 1:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Chad Hendrick
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSBY v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00887
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA, TODD ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Ishee
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wendt v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03275
Plaintiff:
Samuel Clement Wendt
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Todd Ishee, Edward Buffaloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02212
Petitioner:
Ricky Alton Huggins
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03258
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Alexander
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Teresa R. O'Brien and Chairman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
