Cases 31 - 40 of 60
TRUONG v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01750
Plaintiff:
MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, RODRIC BRAY, TODD HUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Rokita et al
as 3:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Marla Rose Miller
Defendant:
Todd Rokita, Vicki Elaine Becker, Terry C Shewmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THE SATANIC TEMPLE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01859
Plaintiff:
THE SATANIC TEMPLE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB and TODD ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/MCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
XIAOLONG SHI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA, INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHABAZZ v. ROKITA
as 1:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-HAKIM SHABAZZ
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Perry v. Lawson et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Darnell Perry
Defendant:
Julie Lawson and Todd Rokita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GERLACH v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
TINA GERLACH
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA, KELLY MITCHELL, CURTIS HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv03109
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. BROOKS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
