Cases 31 - 40 of 315
Dvoinik, et al v. Philipp, et al
as 8:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Elena Dvoinik and Boris Zavadovsky
Defendant:
Peter Philipp, Clemens Dietachmair, Mario Rabl and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 22-1383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BUCHER, WILLIAM BYRWA, BILL DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, FCA US, LLC, ALPHONS IACOBELLI and others
Vetter v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Richard Ryan Vetter
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vetters v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01088
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Vetters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pardo v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Erick Pardo
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, James C. Borel, William T Boehm and others
WATERMAN v. NEOGEN CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
NEOGEN CORP., JAMES C BOREL, WILLIAM T BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Leja v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
Jan Leja
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, James C. Borel, William T. Boehm and others
Stein v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02683
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, John E. Adent, William T. Boehm and others
Hopkins v. Neogen Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Neogen Corp., James C. Borel, William T. Boehm and others
Haskell v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Alti Haskell
Defendant:
County of Nassau, James E. Dzurenda, Donald Vetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
