Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Lane v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00188
Petitioner: Ronnie William Lane
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lane v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00179
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Ronnie William Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lane v. Annucci et al
as 6:2015cv06287
Plaintiff: William Lane
Defendant: Anthony J. Annucci, Albert Prack, Mr. M. Sheahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Bova
as 1:2015cv00071
Petitioner: William Lane
Respondent: Frank Bova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bledsoe v. Nash et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00080
Plaintiff: Demarco D Bledsoe
Defendant: Steven G Nash, William Lane Fitz, Richard Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01931
Plaintiff: William Lane
Defendant: Asset Acceptance, LLC and Fulton Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lane v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00116
Petitioner: Ronnie William Lane
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lane v. The Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02078
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Energy and others
Plaintiff: Mark William Lane
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Lane v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00069
Petitioner: James William Lane
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: James Lane
as 12-11115
Movant: In re: JAMES WILLIAM LANE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?