Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Merrick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv02386
Plaintiff:
Anthony Merrick
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , Lance Hetmer , Greg Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arizona Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Webster Energy and Building Solutions LLC
as 2:2013cv01865
Defendant:
Webster Energy and Building Solutions LLC
Plaintiff:
Arizona Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Arizona Pipe Trades Pension Trust Fund , Arizona Pipe Trades Defined Contribution Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Spencer v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv02652
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Mike Linderman, Rose Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Billy Roger Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. USA
as 2:2012cv00077
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Webster W Norris, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
D'Angelo v. Webster
as 2:2011cv01910
Plaintiff:
Thomas J D'Angelo
Defendant:
Richard Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv00712
Plaintiff:
Christopher F Castillo
Defendant:
Unknown Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Paramount Pictures Corporation et al v. Family Edited DVDs Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv02449
Plaintiff:
Paramount Pictures Corporation , Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Incorporated , Warner Bros. Entertainment Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Family Edited DVDs Incorporated and John Webster
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Webster v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv08181
Plaintiff:
Connie Sue Webster
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Okoli v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sean Okoli
Defendant:
Mesa, City of , Nicholas Webster and Unknown Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
