Cases 31 - 40 of 40
McAllister v. NYS Division of Parole et al
as 9:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
Charles McAllister
Defendant:
NYS Division of Parole, George Alexander, William Smith, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ANDY MOHR-BUICK, PONTIAC, GMC et al
as 1:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ANDY MOHR-BUICK, PONTIAC, GMC, SHAWN M. RHEA and FISHERS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75631
Plaintiff:
ELMER WILLIAM SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
USA v. William Smith, Jr.
as 08-5243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM SMITH, JR.
Tucker v. Pataki et al
as 7:2007cv11569
Petitioner:
Lance E. Tucker
Respondent:
George E. Pataki, Eliot S. Spitzer, Robert Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disia v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv05166
Plaintiff:
Jose Disia
Defendant:
W. William Smith, Jr., James Ferguson and Chris Ortloff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv03921
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
W. William Smith, Jr., James Ferguson and Chris Ortloff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClay v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv02396
Plaintiff:
Scott McClay
Defendant:
W William Smith, Jr., James Ferguson and Chris Ortloff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. N.Y.S. Executive Dept. et al
as 1:2007cv01530
Plaintiff:
Luis Acosta
Defendant:
W. William Smith, Jr., W. William Smith, Jr., James Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Syed et al v. Hamady et al
as 2:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Basit Syed and Ayesha Syed
Defendant:
Michael Hamady, Rogelio Dominguez, Ronald Tabaczynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
