Cases 31 - 39 of 39
McCarroll v. Gill
as 21-1094
Defendant / Appellee:
Dana Ng, Mr., Raytheon, William Tong, Mr., Attorney General, Connecticut, Lamont, Governor, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Margaret McCarroll
Young et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2021cv00474
Defendant:
Burgos, Edwards, Eagleson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Young, Brian Hogan and Westly Lopes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodoro et al v. State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families, The
as 3:2020cv00993
Plaintiff:
Isabella Theodoro and Peter Theodoro
Defendant:
The State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families, Diana Fragomeni, Alyssa Glasow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connecticut Parents Union v. Cardona
as 20-1998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Connecticut Parents Union
Defendant / Appellee:
Allan B. Taylor, in his official capacity as Chairperson of the Connecticut State Department of Educations Board of Education, Ned Lamont, in his official capacity as Governor of Connecticut, Miguel A. Cardona, in his capacity as Commissioner, Connecticut State Department of Education and others
McCarroll v. Gill et al
as 3:2020cv00457
Defendant:
Halloran, John D. McCarroll, Charles Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret McCarroll
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Moran v. Cheshire
as 19-4343
Plaintiff:
Jessica Verner Moran, Est. of
Defendant / Appellee:
Virgo Municipal Finance Fund Inc. L.P., (Atty. Joshua Gilman), Town of Cheshire, Connecticut (Town Manager Sean Kimball), Ricci Construction Group Inc., (Atty. Kevin J. Hecht) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Verner Moran, Exc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
