Cases 31 - 40 of 71,224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SHEET METAL WORKERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. FALCON METAL FABRICATION, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
FALCON METAL FABRICATION, INC. and JERRY LEE ROBERTSON, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381 E.R.I.S.A.
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC v. CITY OF CARMEL
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF CARMEL
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
HEMAK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07102
Plaintiff:
DEBRA HEMAK
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DALE et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
KEYON DALE and LAMONTAY AYERS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRENTON v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL BRENTON
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMSHAFT CAPITAL FUND, LP et al v. BYJU'S ALPHA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00733
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
WHEAT et al v. MENARD INC.
as 1:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
GLEN WHEAT and LINDA WHEAT
Defendant:
MENARD INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COATES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
TRACEY COATES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
