Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 73,805
Walker v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04041
Plaintiff: Kirklon Jacoby Walker
Defendant: Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalaf v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 4:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Sattar Sabri Khalaf
Defendant: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rulford v. USA
as 0:2024cv01741
Petitioner: Tayrel Lamar Rulford
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Zierke v. USA
as 4:2024cv03089
Petitioner: Gary Zierke, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Birdo v. Rykken et al
as 0:2024cv01746
Plaintiff: Tanaka Birdo
Defendant: S. Rykken, Korts, Haugen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Brott et al
as 0:2024cv00964
Plaintiff: Julyen Alozno Martin
Defendant: Joel Brott, Sherburne Jail Commander, Jail Captains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Johnson v. Jacob Schurman, et al
as 24-2002
Plaintiff: Justin Johnson
Defendant: Jacob Schurman, in his individual capacity only and Christopher Taylor, in his individual capacity only
Frederic v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: Philip P Frederic
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barefield v. USA
as 4:2024cv00424
Petitioner: Christopher Barefield
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cowgill v. Bland
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant: Estella Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?