Cases 31 - 40 of 65,582
FCCI Insurance Company v. Bennett et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
FCCI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christopher M Bennett, Michelle Bennett and Master Roof and Remodel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sexson v. Office of Personnel Management
as 4:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Courtney Sexson
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Pennington v. Taylor et al
as 4:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Calvin Taylor and Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Randle v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Tevin Randle
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. EAS Logistics, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv05095
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rodas Lopez
Defendant:
EAS Logistics, LLC, Hook N Book Towing LLC doing business as Freight Pilots and Mohamed Abdelmaksoud
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Sims v. Greene County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Branden D Sims
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Dunagan et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Heath Dunagan, Clint Baker, John C Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Ashley King, Shrika Green, Mary Mena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
