Cases 41 - 50 of 161
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Michael et al
as 3:2020cv00931
Defendant:
BWW Law Firm, LLC, Amy McNulty, Robert R. Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Noble Ali Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
O'Leary v. IT Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01398
Defendant:
IT Concepts, Inc., Amy Johnson, John Epperly and others
Plaintiff:
Erin O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Brown v. Galliher et al
as 7:2020cv00670
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Amy Galliher, Joseph Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Pittsylvania County et al
as 4:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Chris Dunlap, Pittsylvania County, Scottie Lavender and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor and Amy Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $4,543.79 seized from U.S. Bank Acct. 153568031006 et al
as 1:2020cv01343
Defendant:
$25,343.01 seized from Citibank Acct. 145947373, $1,217.05 seized from American Express National Bank Acct. 320013539278, $13,559.97 seized from Captial One Bank Acct. 1361410762 and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
Amy Nelson, Carleton Nelson, E2M Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Jones v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Amy Jones
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lauter v. Schaefer, et al
as 2:2020cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
Amy Burnham, Jane Katoskie, George E. Schaefer, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Mason v. Blow et al
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Peggy Gilman, K.P. Johnson, UpCenter and others
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
