Cases 41 - 50 of 2,935
Doe #058 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Doe #058
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #057 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Doe #057
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Doe (KWS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowe v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
David Rowe
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blakeley v. Shelby County Correctional Center
as 2:2024cv02215
Petitioner:
Michael David Blakeley
Respondent:
Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fraker et al v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Carol Fraker, Erica Reyes, Brittany Meadows and others
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., Optum, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Fontana, Sr. v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Fontana, Sr.
Defendant:
William Lee, David B Rousch and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #055 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe #055
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ward v. Gregory et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tylier D Ward
Defendant:
Keith Gregory, Chief Cantrell, Sara Summerall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
