Cases 41 - 50 of 2,851
Lambka v. Beales
as 2:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Neil David Lambka
Defendant:
Ryan Beales, West Virginia Parole and DCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Legg et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
David F. Legg and Mary R. Legg
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Coss v. Teters et al
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
James A. Coss, Jr.
Defendant:
David Teters, Tyler Teters, Connor Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tasker et al v. Black Rock Wind Force, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Tasker, Betty J. Tasker and David W. Tasker
Defendant:
Black Rock Wind Force, LLC and Clearway Energy Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Craft v. Gills et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
David Craft
Defendant:
John D. Gills and Andy Damewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hairston v. McGuire
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert David Hairston
Defendant:
Officer W. W. McGuire, R. S. Dyson, Sgt. C. C. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luster v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
David Antoine Luster
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rogers v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Justin David Rogers
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission, Correctional Officer Green and Correctional Officer Culbertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockard v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
David Carroll Lockard
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
