Cases 41 - 50 of 194
Baker v. Garfield County Detention Facility
as 5:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Baker, III
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility, Sgt Tim Mosley, Ben Crookes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Cherokee Nation Entertainment, LLC
as 4:2020cv00625
Defendant:
Cherokee Nation Entertainment, LLC doing business as Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Tulsa
Plaintiff:
Marlon Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker Hughes Services International, LLC v. Joshi Technologies International, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00626
Plaintiff:
Baker Hughes Services International, LLC
Defendant:
Joshi Technologies International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Baker v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00349
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John William Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baker v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 5:2020cv00822
Defendant:
Christopher Harlan and Allstate Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lorelied v. Frye et al
as 5:2020cv00819
Plaintiff:
Kit Vivien Lorelied
Defendant:
Lance Frye, Kelly Baker and Kim Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks et al v. Baker et al
as 5:2020cv00776
Plaintiff:
Luis Ortiz and Maja Parks
Defendant:
Justin Baker and Rickie Jasper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. City of Jay Delaware County et al
as 4:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Glenn Mulready, Randall Yates, Caroline M Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Anna Estevez, John Smithee, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Arndt et al v. Hatfield et al
as 5:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Taylor Henderson, Barbara Hatfield, Greg Treat and others
Plaintiff:
David Arndt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
