Cases 41 - 50 of 720
The State of Alabama et al v. United States Department of Commerce et al
as 3:2021cv00211
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Ron Jarmin, United States Bureau of the Census and others
Plaintiff:
William Green, Robert Aderholt, The State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
Aleksandra Slavkovic, State of Utah, Aaron Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hollis v. Caine & Weiner Company LLC
as 5:2021cv00342
Defendant:
Caine & Weiner Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hollis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bumpers v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Alan D. Bumpers
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Warden Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buford v. Dunn et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
WARDEN TERRY RAYBON, Warden Cynthia Stewart, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Octavious Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00264
Defendant:
Tanya Ary, Antoine Price, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Guy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Stewart et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carsbia Van Taylor
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell, Terry Rabon, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al v. Cash App Corporation
as 1:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Chime Financial, LLC and Cynthia Perry
Defendant:
Cash App Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2020cv01969
Plaintiff:
Cynthia D. Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01944
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Russell v. Stewart et al
as 1:2020cv00560
Defendant:
Michael Banks, Commissioner Dunn, Cynthia Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
