Cases 41 - 50 of 1,016
Copen SR v. Daniels et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Copen SR
Defendant:
Pam Daniels, Erin Lynn, Misty Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. SFF Hazelton (Warden)
as 5:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
April Danielle Kennedy
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lemasters et al v. The United States of America
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Janine Lemasters and Daniel Lemasters
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Spriggs et al v. Kordun Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Not Classified By Court:
GEICO Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Kasandra L. Spriggs, A. T. B. and P. E. B.
Defendant:
Kordun Express, Inc., Floyd, Inc., Super Ego Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bowman v. Straughn
as 3:2022cv00033
Petitioner:
Michael Daniel Bowman
Respondent:
Shawn Straughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Daniel
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Cpt. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays et al v. The Cabell County Board of Education et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Herman Mays, Jr., C. M., Elizabeth Mays and others
Defendant:
The Cabell County Board of Education, Ryan Saxe and Daniel Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Ames
as 1:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Daniel W. Collins
Respondent:
Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harless v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Harless
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Riggleman v. Lanham et al
as 2:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Darlene Riggleman
Defendant:
Administrator Bryan K. Lanham, Captain Brian Clowser, C.O. Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
