Cases 41 - 50 of 163
MCALLISTER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
WAYNE H. BUTLER
Defendant:
SHERIFF BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CHIEF DEPUTY ROCKY JOYNER, DIRECTOR ROBERT E. SLATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rippy-Brunton et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rippy-Brunton, Roger Brunton, Harold Lee Rippy, Jr. and others
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCALLISTER v. ARAMARK CORRECTION SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00371
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, CAROL BOSHOLM, DAWN QUASHIE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00073
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kimela Lewis and Kimela Dawn Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Myers v. USA
as 3:2021cv00206
Petitioner:
Kateland Dawn Myers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Poole v. Poole et al
as 7:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Naomi Poole, Christy Donaldson, Dawn Violet Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TYLER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT DETENTION CENTER, MICHALE WALLACE JORDAN, ELIZABETH PALAVEOINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Karen Dawn Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
RICHARDSON v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT; ETC et al
as 1:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
RAYMONT LOWELL RICHARDSON, JR.
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT; ETC, DR. ALAN RHOADES, MRS. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
