Cases 41 - 50 of 1,174
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CRUM v. HENDRIX
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. CRUM
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHMITT v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
ERIC RAY SCHMITT, JR.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02199
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANSBURY v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
ERIC B. SANSBURY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barnes v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barnes
Defendant:
United States and Eric Crismore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rolon v. Frank et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rivera Rolon
Defendant:
Eric Frank and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
