Cases 41 - 50 of 237
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
August, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Zachary August, Syed Ali, Julea Seliavaski and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, D. Awad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Jordan et al
as 3:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee Hall
Defendant:
Ms. Jordan, Mosher, Splan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoots et al v. Sparti et al
as 7:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jessica Nicole Stoots and John Lewis Phillips
Defendant:
Jordan Sparti, Donald Goss and Allyson Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kinard v. Vandermark et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
Ms. Vandermark, Brian Perkins, Melvin Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Gonzalez-Vazquez
as 7:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Juan Antonio Gonzalez-Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kinard v. Mitchen
as 2:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
Ms. Mitchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01095
Plaintiff:
Jordan Jefferson
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Cameron Jeffers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bean v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Euphrates Bean
Defendant:
Dr. Melvin Johnson, Wayne Handley, Heather Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins et al v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Haley Marie Cantrell Adkins and Andrew Jordan Adkins
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia, Paula Meade Hill Collins and Michael Meade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
