Cases 41 - 50 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04285
Defendant:
TERRY, ROSHAY, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES INGRAM and CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TYSON v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 1:2019cv03389
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW CASTLE, Henry County IN, NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLEMAN et al v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC., NIKKI TAFOYA, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZARAGOZA and ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02803
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
TAMMY PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERCE et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02587
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Pierce and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv02346
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, AGNES A. OPOKU, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Plaintiff:
Charles Willis Ingram
Defendant:
Agnes A Opoku, Willson, Knight and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2019cv01740
Defendant:
NICOLE CURTIS, MCNARY, RIVERS and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY MICHAEL WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
