Cases 41 - 50 of 1,564
Wright v. Bymes et al
as 1:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Howard Bruce Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Dan Bymes and Mike Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
RASHAD M. WILLIAMS and MELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL R. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mokshefski v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Mokshefski
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Todd Haskins, Prime Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HOWARD
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Michaud v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
John Michaud
Defendant:
Superintendent Gina Clark and Sergeant King-Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRODIE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 2:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BRODIE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SUH v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2023cv01338
Lead Plaintiff:
Howard Suh
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HOWARD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
MORRIS HOWARD
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ERIE COUNTY PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
