Cases 41 - 50 of 148
Richardson v. Quick et al
as 1:2019cv01208
Defendant:
C. Hiram and Diancira Quick
Plaintiff:
Richard Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Abad et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11929
Plaintiff:
Frank Lipari, David Solorzano, Antonio Rosa and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Ajami v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11855
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Plaintiff:
Susan Ajami, Leonard Parr, Michael Scotto Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Abraham et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11515
Plaintiff:
John Zimmerman, Daniel Jankowski, Alex Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Orpilla et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
Michael Orpilla, Miguel Quinones, Peter Panariello and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Jorgensen v. Rowan Companies PLC et al
as 1:2018cv10423
Defendant:
Suzanne P. Nimocks, Jack B. Moore, Thomas P. Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Atle Jorgensen
Fernandez v. Lowe et al
as 7:2018cv08887
Defendant:
Sergeant Todd Paroline, Dr. Felix Ezekwe, Leon Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Pablo Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smolen v. Brown et al
as 7:2018cv07621
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Smolen
Defendant:
C.O. Lyle L. Carrington, I.G.R.C. Supv. Q. Quick, John Doe-Inmate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demuth v. New York State Police et al
as 3:2018cv00936
Defendant:
INV. R. Quick, INV. Soden, New York State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demuth v. New York State Police et al
as 3:2018cv00796
Defendant:
INV. R. Quick, Senior INV. Kiltpatrick, Town of Norwich and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Demuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
