Cases 41 - 50 of 182
ROBINSON et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2020cv00047
Defendant:
A.L. COLLINS, HEATHER R. ALEXANDER, CASSANDRA L. BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
PEGGY M. H. ROBINSON, APLC, LEONARD A. ROBINSON and PEGGY M. HAIRSTON ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunbar v. DeGuehery
as 5:2019ct03364
Defendant:
Dr. Lindsey DeGuehery
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leonard Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON et al v. AUTOMONEY, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00877
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER TAYLOR, JULIA HARRISON, BRIAN BREVARD and others
Defendant:
AUTOMONEY, INC. and AUTOMONEY NORTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNOTT v. USA
as 1:2019cv00859
Petitioner:
LEONARD J. KNOTT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
THOMAS-BEY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2019cv00692
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZAHA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLSON et al v. SELECT MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00519
Plaintiff:
BRIONA ALLEN, CAMERON MOODY, TAMMY ROGERS and others
Defendant:
KIPLING FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, LOANMAX, LLC, LOANSMART, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLSON, ET AL. v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00490
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN NICHOLSON, ET AL., EUELL STANFIELD, ANGELIQUE GRAY and others
Counter Defendant:
DOMINIQUE BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Saul
as 4:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
George Leonard Taylor
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Woodard v. Smith
as 5:2019hc02139
Petitioner:
Michael Leonard Woodard, Jr.
Respondent:
Dee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
