Cases 41 - 50 of 328
Berrios v. Bailey et al
as 5:2023cv05019
Plaintiff:
Mitchell L. Berrios
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Bailey, Nancy Pryor and Corporal Harwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Roderick Demarius Freeman
Defendant:
Harper, Mitchell, Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Mitchell
as 4:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Rickey A Dixon
Defendant:
Renata Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
CCRD Global, LLC v. Flossie Mitchell et al
as 6:2022cv06126
Plaintiff:
CCRD Global, LLC
Defendant:
Flossie Mitchell, Regions Bank and Unknown spouse of Flossie Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Hunter v. Weeks et al
as 1:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Derek Hunter
Defendant:
Mitchell Weeks and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Mitchell v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel K Mitchell
Defendant:
USA and John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2022cv04117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Connie Mitchell, James Ross, James Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Lathan Mitchell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mitchell v. USA
as 4:2022cv01028
Petitioner:
Kristopher Barnard Mitchell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mitchell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2022cv02150
Plaintiff:
Brittany M. Mitchell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
