Cases 41 - 50 of 184
Eubanks v. Bishop
as 21-20408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Ray Eubanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Bishop, Brian Collier, John Werner and others
POLLARD-OJO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv15672
Plaintiff:
LINDA POLLARD-OJO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eubanks v. Ms. Bishop et al
as 4:2021cv01879
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Dr. Lianette Linthicum, Senior Warden Boscoe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00772
Plaintiff:
Theresa Russell, Monica Salazar, Tamar Perkinson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson, PTI Royston, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ojo v. USA
as 0:2021cv01658
Petitioner:
Olanrewaju Tunde Ojo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv11360
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS, WOODLEY, D'ANDREA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv11357
Defendant:
CHARLES GREEN, ECCF DOE #1-10 and ESSEX COUNTY
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. BERGEN COUNTY, et al
as 2:2021cv11359
Defendant:
MICHAEL TSIOLAS, STEVEN AHRENDT, P. ALLEGRETTA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. CORECIVIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv11362
Defendant:
CORECIVIC, INC., ERIKA GONZALEZ, SANDRA TUTLER and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 6:2021cv06301
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Olukayode David Ojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
