Cases 41 - 50 of 2,463
Smith v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith et al v. Sansone Group, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Carla Smith, Claude Lacy Jr. and Claude Lacy, Jr.
Defendant:
Sansone Group LLC, Metropolitan Village Apartments, LP, Sansone Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Holmes v. Precythe et al
as 6:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Michelle Buckner, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eudaley v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tracie Eudaley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ryan Wells, Ashley Lepold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith v. Raymore Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Justin Blake Smith
Defendant:
Raymore Police Department, Jacob Keltner and Allen Devor
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Starbucks Corporation
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hearn v. Caldwell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv06009
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hearn
Defendant:
Caldwell County Detention Center, Smith, Caldwell County Detention Center Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
