Cases 41 - 50 of 187
Peak v. Smith
as 8:2020cv00525
Defendant:
Kathy Smith
Plaintiff:
Terrijana Peak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correction Services et al
as 8:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Dayna, Brandi and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Eberhardt et al
as 8:2020cv00357
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
County Deputy's, Jason Dwinell and Rick Eberhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanko v. Smith, King, Simmons, & Conn Law Firm et al
as 7:2020cv05005
Defendant:
Dennis King, Smith, King, Simmons, & Conn Law Firm, Michael Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Rudy Stanko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2020cv00291
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Clarence Smith
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Campbell v. Betta-Cole et al
as 8:2020cv00177
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, John Herdman, Lisa M. Gonzolas and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Angelo Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Due v. Bataillon et al
as 8:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Richard G. Koph, Matthew R. Hoffman, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00176
Plaintiff:
Diana K. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bumann v. Nebraska Mental Health Board et al
as 8:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Matthew Headley, Nebraska Mental Health Board, Mental Health Board of Madison County and others
Petitioner:
Justin Bumann
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. City of Grand Island et al
as 8:2019cv00473
Defendant:
City of Grand Island, Dean Elliott, Justin Roehrich and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
