Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Smith et al v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00377
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and AMF Pro Bowl Lanes
Plaintiff: Phillip D Smith and Monica R Tanzey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC v. AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN
as 2:2019cv10656
Defendant: AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lupo v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 6:2018cv06897
Plaintiff: Michael Lupo
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lupo v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01439
Plaintiff: Michael Lupo
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark et al v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00149
Plaintiff: Timothy Clark, Georgia M. Clark and Shanice L. Oliver
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greenwald v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00503
Plaintiff: Jennifer Greenwald
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Omland et al v. Bowlmor Corporation
as 5:2018cv00047
Plaintiff: Nathan Omland and Efrain Dagdag
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and Bowlero Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brian Whitaker v. Playa Lincoln, LP et al
as 2:2018cv00394
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc, Does, PLGP, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC v. AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv09981
Defendant: AMF BOWLING CENTERS INC. and AMF BOWLING WORLDWIDE, INC.
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03797
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?