Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Hasan v. Sessions
as 17-2379
Petitioner:
Kazi Abul Hasan
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Basher et al v. Fishbien et al
as 1:2017cv03596
Defendant:
2166 Dean LLC and Paul Fishbien
Plaintiff:
Abul Basher and Yusuf Abdur Rahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Basher et al v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03025
Plaintiff:
Yusef Abdur-Rahman and Abul Basher
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing, LLC and President Tony Renzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Basher v. Federal National Mortage Association
as 1:2017cv03024
Plaintiff:
Abul Basher
Fannie Mae:
Federal National Mortage Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Black Funnel Shipping Ltd. v. Abul Khair Steel Melting Limited
as 2:2017cv01205
Defendant:
Abul Khair Steel Melting Limited
Plaintiff:
Black Funnel Shipping Ltd.
CRUZ et al v. JMC HOLDINGS, LTD. et al
as 2:2016cv09321
Plaintiff:
JESY CRUZ , LUIS RODRIGUEZ , MERCEDES TRINIDAD and others
Defendant:
JMC HOLDINGS, LTD., JOHN CILMI and JOHN DOES #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ma'at El v. Doe
as 16-3767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Asirus Ma'at El, AKA C. Martin El
Defendant - Appellee:
Officer Norris Cardoza, City of New York, Officer Abul Chowdhury, Shield # 03375 and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Other and Other Accomplice
Refaat Abul Hosn v. US Dept of State, Sec of State, et al
as 16-2408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REFAAT F. ABUL HOSN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, SECRETARY OF STATE, Colin Powell and COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY DIRECTOR, Paul Bremer
Ahmed Abull Al- Haj v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 16-3771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMED MUHAMMED ABULL AL- HAJ
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FAIRTON FCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
