Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Kadambi et al v. Express Scripts Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00321
Plaintiff:
Ashok Kadambi , Linda Hinant , Nancy Hunt and others
Defendant:
Express Scripts Inc , Accredo Health Group Inc , Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanigan et al v. Accredo Health Group, Inc.
as 3:2013cv04827
Plaintiff:
Sue Hanigan and Samuel Vance
Defendant:
Accredo Health Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wright v. Accredo Health Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02226
Plaintiff:
Debbie Wright
Defendant:
Accredo Health Group, Inc. and Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MEDCO HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA , THE STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant:
MEDCO HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. , ACCREDO HEALTH GROUP, INC. and HEMOPHILIA HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Martin et al v. Accredo Health Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00459
Plaintiff:
John Henry Martin, Jr. and John Henry Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Accredo Health Group, Inc., Hemophilia Resources of America, Inc., Hemophilia Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maynard et al v. Accredo Therapeutics Inc et al
as 3:2009cv04564
Plaintiff:
Tamara Maynard, Joseph Maynard and Sean Maynard
Defendant:
Accredo Therapeutics Inc, Deltec Inc, Accredo Health Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.