Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv00257
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
ALEX C. FERGUSSON, LLC v. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION EXPERTS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01025
Defendant:
KENNETH W. CRONCH, INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION EXPERTS, INC., 4ICE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX C. FERGUSSON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
King v. Piedmont Regional Jail et al
as 5:2018ct03331
Plaintiff:
Alex Ohara King
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 5:2018ct03272
Defendant:
Maxine M. Chesney, J.C. Holland, Joseph S. Zonno and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang Bao Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyer v. Burreal et al
as 5:2018ct03252
Defendant:
Stephanie Hollemback, Amy Bullock, Unnamed Federal Bureau of Prisons employees and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIBBEY v. NATIONAL RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00723
Defendant:
JAMES OKOH, NATIONAL RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS, PA and NATIONAL RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
Plaintiff:
ALEX D BIBBEY and ALEX D. BIBBEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Azar
as 1:2018cv00181
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Greater Carolina Ear Nose and Throat P.A. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al -
as 5:2018cv00265
Plaintiff:
Greater Carolina Ear Nose and Throat P.A.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greater Carolina Ear Nose and Throat P.A. v. Azar
as 5:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
Greater Carolina Ear Nose and Throat P.A.
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
